A Force on the Fault Line - How Pakistan's provincial police became the deliberate target of a converging militant campaign, and a political weapon in the fight between Islamabad and the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf (PTI) government in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.
On the evening of 9 May, an explosives-laden vehicle rammed the Fatah Khel police checkpost in Bannu district, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Gunmen and weaponized quadcopters followed the blast into the compound. According to Pakistani police and Foreign Office accounts, fifteen KP policemen were killed and four others injured, including a civilian; international wire reporting placed the toll as high as 21 officers. An armored police vehicle stationed at the post had been destroyed, and a newly named Tehrik-i-Taliban (TTP) linked faction, Ittehad-ul-Mujahideen Pakistan, had claimed responsibility. Pakistan's Foreign Office summoned the Afghan chargé d'affaires the following morning and handed over a démarche.
Several days later, on 20 May, militants attacked the Military Police station at Chitarwata in the Koh-i-Sulaiman tribal belt of Dera Ghazi Khan — extending the police-targeting pattern into Souther Punjab, even as personnel escaped unharmed.
Fatah Khel was the deadliest single police loss of the year. It was also the rule, not the exception. The provincial police force is now the most-attacked uniformed body in Pakistan, and the pattern is consistent across both Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) and Balochistan. That fact is reshaping the threat landscape, alongside the politics of the federation.
THE SHAPE OF THE ATTACK CURVE
A growing share of Pakistan's terrorism violence in 2026 is now being directed explicitly at police forces. The geography concentrates in two arcs. The first traces southern Khyber Pakhtunkhwa — Bannu, Lakki Marwat, Tank, Dera Ismail Khan, Hangu, Karak, and Bajaur — the districts that have absorbed the bulk of the TTP’s operational tempo since the group's resurgence in recent years (post 2021/2022). The second runs through Balochistan — Khuzdar, Mastung, Nushki, Kech, and Nasirabad — where the Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA) and Balochistan Liberation Front (BLF) are running a parallel campaign, tactically distinct from the TTP but converging on the same target set. Gilgit-Baltistan has also begun appearing in the record.
This year's tempo sits on top of an already worsening baseline. Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Inspector General of Police Zulfiqar Hameed has reported that 159 KP policemen were killed in 2025 across 536 attacks (324 of them repulsed), with Bannu district alone logging 134 of those attacks, 27 of them fatal. Of the 437 security personnel Pakistan lost to terrorism nationwide in 2025, 174 — the single largest contingent — wore the green-and-blue of a provincial police force rather than the khaki of the army. Reportedly, KP also saw a 50 percent surge in terror incidents across 2025.
Even a non-exhaustive list of the year's prominent incidents is enough to convey the operational signature. On 12 January, an IED struck a police armored personnel carrier on the Gomal–Jatta road in Tank district, killing Additional SHO Ishaq Ahmad Khan of Gomal police station along with Assistant Sub-Inspector Sher Aslam Khan, four other constables, and a civilian passer-by. On 15 January, militants stormed the Kharan City Police Station along with the National Bank of Pakistan and Habib Bank Limited, looting roughly PKR 3.4 million before security forces killed twelve militants across three engagements (Pakistan's ISPR labeled the attackers "Fitna Al Hindustan"; independent reporting attributed the attack to Baloch separatists). In late January, BLA's six-day Operation Herof 2.0 — a coordinated campaign across more than fourteen cities, hit police installations among dozens of state and civilian targets. BLF, operating in parallel through the period, has continued a distinct pattern of capturing local police personnel during checkpoint and patrol ambushes and then conditionally releasing them after disarming them — a maneuver documented in The Durand Dispatch Strategic Messaging, April 2026 edition, that is designed to project parallel-administration in Balochistan rather than to maximize kill counts. On 13 March, an IED on a police patrol along the Shahdikhel–Mastikhel road in Lakki Marwat's Bettani subdivision killed seven officers, including SHO Sadr Azam Khan of Shadi Khel police station; six died on the spot and one succumbed to injuries later.
April escalated the violent pattern. On the night of 2–3 April, a suicide vehicle-borne IED was rammed into the rear of Domel police station in Bannu; barricades preserved the policemen inside, but five civilians, four of them from a single family, were killed and thirteen wounded. April’s national Polio vaccination drive also opened a fresh attack window on police escort details. Constable Israrul Haq was killed and four colleagues wounded in Hangu's Thall tehsil when militants ambushed the police squad protecting a vaccination team. The following day, Constable Farman Bashir Behrani was shot dead in Dera Murad Jamali in Balochistan's Nasirabad while standing guard outside a house where a polio vaccination team was administering drops. Also in April, three Gilgit-Baltistan police officers were killed and five others wounded, including DSP Faqeer Muhammad, when their vehicle was ambushed as they returned from a two-day poppy-eradication operation in Thore Nullah, Diamer district — an incident that sits within the Ittehad-ul-Mujahideen (IUM) surge in attacks on police and security forces in Gilgit-Baltistan documented in The Durand Dispatch Strategic Messaging, April 2026 issue, which identifies IUM, rather than the TTP brand, as the rising perpetrator of police violence in the region. A few days later, militants used a modified commercial quadcopter to drop explosives on a police position during an operation in Hangu's Sarki Payala–Chamba Gul area, killing a senior officer and injuring a constable — the latest in a sustained pattern of weaponized commercial drone strikes on KP police that began with multiple incidents in Bannu during 2025. In late April, an ambush in the Bajoi area of Khuzdar district killed Lady Constable Malik Naz alongside Head Constable Sami Ullah during a police search operation following a theft complaint; she is reported as the first woman police officer in Balochistan's history to be killed in such an encounter.
May continued the curve. In early May, Constable Irfanullah was shot dead near his home in Lakki Marwat — he had returned to his native village on leave from Peshawar. The night before, an IED had been planted at another constable's residence in Shadikhel. In mid May came Fatah Khel, a vehicle-borne IED carrying an estimated 1,200 to 1,500 kg of explosives rammed the checkpost, followed by a complex assault; of the eighteen police personnel deployed at the post, fifteen were killed and three pulled alive from the rubble. On 12 May, a loader rickshaw packed with explosives detonated at the Sarai Naurang bazaar in Lakki Marwat during rush hour, killing at least nine people, among them two traffic policemen (Adil Jan and Rahatullah) and a woman, wounding more than thirty. The threat actors implicated in these incidents are legible and consistent: the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan and its splinters (most recently Ittehad-ul-Mujahideen Pakistan and the Hafiz Gul Bahadur faction) in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, and the BLA and BLF in Balochistan.
THE MILITANT LOGIC: WHY THE POLICE, AND WHY NOW
The concentration of attacks on provincial police is not opportunistic. It reflects four interlocking logics that are visible across the broader counterterrorism literature.
The first is retaliation against the agency that is actually disrupting militant cells.
Pakistan's army and Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) still receive the bulk of public attention, but the operational frontline against the TTP inside KP is increasingly held by the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Police's Counter-Terrorism Department and the regular force. Inspector General of the Police (IGP) Hameed's own figures indicate that KP Police conducted 3,277 intelligence-based operations (IBOS) in 2025, arrested roughly 1,300 terrorists, and defused 110 IEDs and 385 grenades. The province's Dispute Resolution Councils settled more than 6,300 community disputes, a quiet counter-radicalization function that strips the militants of one of their preferred entry points into local life. From the militants' perspective, attacking the army is a slow, costly, propaganda-laden affair; attacking the police hits the actual organization running the IBOs, the search operations, and any community-level interdiction.
The second logic is asymmetric cost-exchange.
A provincial constable is cheap to kill and politically expensive to lose. Khyber Pakhtunkhwa's police is the lowest-paid force in the country — a constable earns roughly PKR 69,000 a month, and a deputy superintendent earns PKR 184,867 against PKR 453,727 for the equivalent rank in Balochistan, a gap of nearly two and a half times. The province's Shuhada (martyrs') package, a welfare package given to the families of those who have died serving in the line of duty, is also the lowest in the federation. TheIGP has formally written to the Chief Minister of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa to request "hard area" status, at an estimated annual cost of PKR 2.2 billion. That request remains unfunded. From the militants' side of the equation, the math is straightforward: cheaper targets, lighter armor, slower rotations, and constables who often live in the same villages where the militants operate. The current campaign is also one of deliberate geographic extension: as documented in The Durand Dispatch Strategic Messaging April 2026 edition, TTP's expansion into the previously dormant Khyber Pakhtunkhwa districts of Kohat, Karak, and Mardan, with Badaber (Peshawar) emerging as a buffer-zone lynchpin between urban centers and the tribal belt.
The third logic is organizational consolidation, which is sometimes misread as fragmentation.
The recent increase of new claim brands — IUM claiming Fatah Khel, and smaller outfits including the Hafiz Gul Bahadur network operating in parallel — looks superficially like a fractured movement. In fact, the opposite is closer to true. A 2018 analysis of the TTP leadership’s argued that the post-2018 restoration of Mehsud leadership under Mufti Noor Wali Mehsud re-anchored the group's command, discipline, and capacity for sustained campaigns. Since July 2020, that consolidation has run through a sustained campaign of mergers with over 75 militant factions, including from Balochistan, brought under the TTP umbrella, rebuilt on a deliberately federal model that lets sub-commanders retain operational autonomy. The current police-targeting wave is the operational expression of that consolidation, executed through a deliberately diversified franchise system that lets the umbrella maintain ideological coherence while distributing claim risk across multiple banners. The Islamic State Khorasan dimension adds competitive pressure on the TTP to maintain visible operational tempo or risk losing recruits and sympathizers.
The fourth logic is legitimacy warfare
Each constable killed in Bannu sends a different signal than an army convoy ambush. The army is distant; the constable stands at the bazaar, at the polio booth, at the corner stand outside the school. Their death is felt locally and travels rapidly across regional social media. This is precisely the mechanism through which militant violence corrodes state legitimacy — not by defeating the state militarily but by demonstrating, week after week, that it cannot protect even its most visible local officials. The intent is stated, not merely inferred. Mufti Noor Wali Mehsud's Eid ul-Fitr 2026 statement explicitly urged law enforcement officials to resign and ordinary Pakistanis to join the militant struggle, framing the army and police as Ghulam fauj (slave army) and a colonial relic. The TTP and BLA each pursue legitimacy attacks for different ideological ends; they are converging in tactics. The result is a feedback loop. The more police die, the less confidence local communities have in the state's protection promise; the less protection the state offers, the easier it becomes for militants to operate inside those communities; the easier it becomes to operate, the more police die.
THE FEDERAL–PROVINCIAL FRACTURE
The most under-discussed second-order effect of the police-killing wave is the damage it is doing and is likely to keep doing, to the relationship between the federal government in Islamabad and the PTI-led provincial government in Peshawar.
Sohail Afridi assumed office as Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Chief Minister on 15 October 2025. He almost immediately blamed the federal center's "flawed policy" for the resurgence of terrorism in the province. The military's public-relations wing responded in an extraordinary public rebuke, accusing the PTI provincial leadership of fostering a "politically conducive environment" for a criminal-terror nexus, and claiming that the KP leadership had sought assistance from Afghanistan while opposing counterterrorism operations at multiple forums. PTI rejected the charge in full. For a military media wing to publicly accuse a sitting provincial government in these terms marked a real escalation in center–province distrust, not just sharp language.
The dispute carries direct operational consequences for the police. Reportedly, federal vehicles and equipment were withdrawn from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa in October 2025 amid the political quarrel, and have not been fully restored. The Tirah Valley displacement crisis of January and February 2026, in which tens of thousands of civilians were displaced amid rumors of an unconsulted counterterrorism operation, deepened the rift. The KP government rejected the federal narrative that the displacement was "routine migration"; federal ministers argued in turn that since Tirah falls within provincial jurisdiction, the province should be accountable. Neither side accepted responsibility, and the displaced population paid the carrying cost while the political quarrel continued.
The pattern is now notable. Every major attack triggers a predictable sequence. Federal officials and ISPR briefings blame the KP government for governance failure, soft handling of militants, and political obstruction. The provincial government, in turn, blames Islamabad for under-resourcing the police force, withdrawing federal equipment, running operations without provincial consent, and refusing to grant the "hard area" pay status the IGP has requested. Brief moments of stated cooperation — the Shehbaz–Afridi telephonic contact the morning after Fatah Khel — do not yet add up to a working arrangement that survives the next attack. Meanwhile, the constables of Bannu continue to be buried, and the political dividend from each new funeral accrues twice: once to the militants who staged the attack, and once to whichever political actor is best positioned to blame the other side for it. The militants benefit tactically and politically. The state benefits in neither register.
BOTTOM LINE
The 2026 wave of attacks on Pakistan's provincial police is a tactical adaptation by a consolidating militant ecosystem, a deliberate legitimacy attack on the state's most visible local face, and an accelerant on an already corrosive federal–provincial fight. Unless and until the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa police are paid, equipped, armored, and politically backed at parity with the threat they absorb, and unless and until Islamabad and Peshawar stop using each funeral as ammunition against one another, the April–May tempo is likely to become the floor, not the ceiling. The militants are operating with a coherent campaign logic. The state, at present, is not.
See more from The Durand Dispatch - Perspectives here:
